1
Anonymous
15 Nov 2012 9:51PM

1) http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/opinion/the-bush-white-house-was-deaf-to-9-11-warnings.html. If Obama is getting Republican screaming he gets impeached for the handling of Libya, where were those same Republicans after 9/11 when the Bush administration ignored the warnings that could have prevented a terrorist attack, regardless if they knew the exact details or not.
2)
"We seized the entire records of the Iraqi Nuclear program, especially the administrative records. We got a name of everybody, where they worked, what they did, and the top of the list, Saddam's "Bombmaker" [which was the title of Hamza's book, and earned the nickname afterwards] was a man named Jafar Dhia Jafar, not Khidir Hamza, and if you go down the list of the senior administrative personnel you will not find Hamza's name in there. In fact, we didn't find his name at all. Because in 1990, he didn't work for the Iraqi nuclear program. He had no knowledge of it because he worked as a kickback specialist for Hussein Kamel in the p********ial Palace.

He goes into northern Iraq and meets up with Ahmad Chalabi. He walks in and says, I'm Saddam's "Bombmaker". So they call the CIA and they say, "We know who you are, you're not Saddam's 'Bombmaker', go sell your story to someone else." And he was released, he was rejected by all intelligence services at the time, he's a fraud.

And here we are, someone who the CIA knows is a fraud, the US Government knows is a fraud, is allowed to sit in front of the United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations and give testimony as a expert witness. I got a problem with that, I got a problem with the American media, and I've told them over and over and over again that this man is a documentable fraud, a fake, and yet they allow him to go on CNN, MSNBC, CNBC, and testify as if he actually knows what he is talking about."
They based this guys testimony as evidence for WMDs in Iraq. Just one example of the bullshit the Government fed to convince everyone the war was justified. If Obama did that? SECEDE!
3) And no, as the war dragged on sure, towards the end of Bush's term, sure, but the amount of republican supporters defending the Iraq war until the truth became too real to dismiss was almost unanimous.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.

Replies 0

1
Anonymous
16 Nov 2012 3:42AM

1) Link Fail! If you really believe that the intel briefings Bush got before 9/11 were detailed about the plot and that Bush ignored the clear warning signs, you're a fucking idiot.

2) & 3) We'll never know the truth about the Iraqi nuclear program, because we gave them several months after the war to hide whatever they could before the inspectors got the "entire records". How much was trucked into Syria? How much was destroyed, altered? The weapons inspectors found no chemical WMDs, but apparently the Euphrates river was a chemical soup. What did they dump into it? But hey, you saw Al Capones record books, so you can clearly see he isn't a mobster.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.